LOADING

Type to search

Periodontics Supporting Your Practice

What are the benefits of laser therapy?

Laser in dentistryThis response summary is based on “Laser-Assisted Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy” in Principles and Practice of Laser Dentistry (2nd Edition), Elsevier, 2016

Mary Lynn Smith & Angie Mott

In any periodontal therapy, it is essential that contaminants be thoroughly removed from the tooth structure. Lasers have a direct damaging effect on bacteria, supporting the body’s healing response. Incorporating lasers into conventional therapies helps accomplish treatment objectives.

Instrumentation in conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy focuses on the tooth structure and debridement most often is accomplished by means of manual and power scaling. In the future, lasers also will be used for root debridement.

Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet cleared the use of lasers for removal of deposits and biofilm from tooth structure, some studies suggest there are benefits in using lasers. It should be emphasized that laser treatment is an addition to, not a replacement for, conventional periodontal therapy.

  • Deposits and biofilm are more thoroughly removed and a more biocompatible surface is created for reattachment with use of an erbium laser than with con­ventional methods. (1, 2)
  • The carbon dioxide (CO2) laser has been shown to increase adherence of fibroblasts to root surfaces, and the fibroblast adherence is superior to conventional techniques both in quantity of fibroblasts attached and in the quality of the attachment. (3)
  • The argon (Ar), neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG), and diode laser wavelengths show strong absorption in darkly pigmented bacteria, with a consequent direct, increased effect on the red and orange–complex bacteria associated with periodontitis. (4)
  • Both CO2 and erbium lasers act on pathogens by heating intracellular fluids, causing the microbes to collapse. (5, 6) The absorption of laser energy by tissues produces a photothermal effect. With use of the appropriate settings, most non-sporulating bacteria, including anaerobes, are readily deactivated at 50° C. (7, 8)
  • In laser-assisted active phase I periodontal infection therapy, the diseased biofilm-infested tissues of periodontal pockets are debrided. With laser techniques that involve working close to the recommended parameter of 60° C (9), the healthy tissue beneath the non-healing granulation layer is not affected by the low energy.
  • It was reported that the bleed­ing index improved in 96.9% of the patients treated with laser-assisted periodontal therapy after conventional therapy, compared with 66.7% of patients treated convention­ally without laser: “the diode laser assisted periodontal therapy provided a bacteri­cidal effect, reduced inflammation, and supported healing of periodontal pockets through elimination of bacteria.” (10)
  • Lasers have the ability to seal capillaries and lymphatics, and therefore, reducing swelling at the treated site and minimizing postoperative discomfort. (11)
  • Another benefit is the healing stimulated at the cellular level. (12) Low-level laser treatment depresses the exudative phase while enhancing the proliferative processes during acute and chronic inflammation. Laser photobio-modulation can activate the local blood circulation and stimulate proliferation of endothelial cells. (13, 14)

References

  1. Aoki A, Sasaki KM, Watanabe H, Ishikawa I: Lasers in nonsurgi­cal periodontal therapy, Periodontol 2000(36):59–97, 2004.
  2. Schwarz F, Sculean A, Berakdar M, et al.: In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a compara­tive histologic study, Lasers Surg Med 32:359–366, 2003.
  3. Crespi R, Barone A, Covanin U, et al.: Effects of CO2 laser treat­ment on fibroblast attachment to root surfaces: an SEM analysis, J Periodontol 73:1308–1312, 2002.
  4. Finkbeiner RL: The results of 1328 periodontal pockets treated with the argon laser: selective pocket thermolysis, J Clin Laser Med Surg 13:273–281, 1995.
  5. Kreisler M, Kohnen W, Marinello C, et al.: Bactericidal effect of the Er:YAG laser radiation on dental implant surfaces: an in vitro study, J Periodontol 73(11):1292–1298, 2002.
  6. Alling C, Catone G: Laser applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery, Philadelphia, 1997, Saunders.
  7. Coluzzi DJ, Convissar RA: Atlas of laser applications in dentistry, Chicago, 2007, Quintessence.
  8. Cobb CM: Non-surgical pocket therapy: mechanical, Ann Peri­odontol 1:443–490, 1996.
  9. Manni JG: Dental applications of advanced lasers, Burlington Mass, 2004, JGM Associates.
  10. Moritz A, Schoop U, Goharkhay K, et al.: Treatment of peri­odontal pockets with a diode laser. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental School of the University of Vienna, Austria, Lasers Surg Med 22(5):302–311, 1998.
  11. Gans SL, Austin E: The use of lasers in pediatric surgery, J Pediatr Surg 23(8):695–704, 1988.
  12. Jia YL, Guo ZY: Effect of low-power He-Ne laser irradiation on rab­bit articular chondrocytes in vitro, Lasers Surg Med 34(4):323–328, 2004.
  13. Schindl A, Schindl M, Schindl L, et al.: Increased dermal angio­genesis after low-intensity laser therapy for a chronic radiation ulcer determined by a video measuring system, J Am Acad Dermatol 40(3):481–484, 1999.
  14. Garavello I, Baranauskas V, da Cruz-Hofling MA: The effects of low laser irradiation on angiogenesis in injured rat tibiae, Histol Histopathol 19(1):43–48, 2004.

8 Comments

  1. PAUL BELZYCKI August 13, 2015

    You guys must be really struggling for stuff to put on this site. A few weeks back, there was a post claiming that there is “no scientific evidence” that lasers offer or improve anything better than conventional/surgical therapy. My comment was, if laser users cared to look at the scientific evidence, they would not have purchased the useless device in the first place. Or, they understand this and have bought the laser so they can call themselves “Laser Dentist” and fool the public.

    I am bemused and saddened at the rudimentary level of material presented on this site.

    ” You can’t fool an “Old GP”.

    Reply
    1. JCDA Oasis August 13, 2015

      Hello Dr. Belzycki,

      Thank you for your comment. Your comment could start a productive and engaging conversation about the use of lasers in dentistry: are they beneficial, are they not? Do lasers have a future in dentistry or do they not? The Oasis Discussions team, strives to present information which sparks relevant and engaging conversations that bring the Canadian dental community together and helps Canadian dentists make informed decisions.

      CDA Oasis Team

      Reply
    2. Lonny Legault August 20, 2015

      Dear “Old GP” ,
      As with almost any topic you are going to find “science” supporting one position or the other. This is far from a new phenomenon. An example would be the hot topic of fluoride in drinking water. By looking at two conflicting reports in the sea of “scientific evidence” that exists regarding laser efficacy in treating periodontal disease why do you assume one is correct and the other is not? Most things in life are not black and white, right or wrong, and a prudent view would suggest laser benefits to fall into this more common thought process. Anecdotal, I own a few different wave lengths of lasers and have found them to be useful for treating periodontal disease and peri-implantitis. They are an adjunct, another tool in the chest, not the end-all-be-all. With that said, I would never give up my lasers, as I can do many useful procedures that I could not without them, which ultimately benefits my patients.

      Reply
  2. David Tessier August 13, 2015

    In cases of controversial or topics of new technologies, I believe a healthy and educated discussion with several points of view (especially extreme viewpoints like this laser example) all in ONE article is the best approach. It is like good journalism…present both sides to those who are reading.
    I hope Oasis’s philosophy (as mentioned in the response to Paul’s comment) is the new standard from here on in…

    Reply
  3. Dr. Ahmad August 13, 2015

    I think it’s imperative that professionals learn that all lasers are not the same. The onus of picking the right kind of laser to achieve a specific objective is on us. There’s a lot of misinformation out there.

    Reply
  4. Pierre-Luc Michaud August 19, 2015

    This is not science. The author was clearly biased. Both sides of the story need to be presented; not only what the author believes in. Systematic reviews and meta analyses are available on the subject. Why were they not used instead?
    According to most recent systematic reviews, there MAY be some advantages to use lasers in periodontics (though due to heterogeneity of studies it is difficult to conclude; some say it would be advantageous only when used in conjunction with scaling and root planning), but it does not seem to be as clear as stated on this page here.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24697584
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25164559

    Reply
  5. Avi Shelemay September 7, 2015

    It would have been more beneficial to the reader if the article relied on more than one source. The American Academy Of Periodontology position on the LANAP procedure is that it has not been demonstrated to be more efficient than conventional periodontal therapy. Seldom new technology completely replaces existing modalities of treatment. The LANAP procedure should be regarded as just another tool to treat patients. Perhaps those patients where conventional treatment would be too risky due to medical considerations. New technology should not be used as a marketing tool feeding on patients’ fears of conventional therapy. As a periodontist who perform periodontal surgery on a daily basis, I can say that patients’ fears are understandable but often not justified (and they admit to that at their post op visit).

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *